After watching the Denver Broncos steamroll over the Atlanta Falcons
in the lowest-rated Super Bowl in a decade, after seeing Fortune
500 companies spend millions of dollars to air the same crummy
commercials we saw last week and after witnessing Big Bad
Voodoo Daddy drive what is probably the final nail in the whole
"swing revival" movement with an embarrassingly hokey
half-time show, at least we had a brand new TV show to look forward
to. Unfortunately, the show that FOX chose to gift us with in
the plush post-Super Bowl spot was "The Family Guy."
By my tabulations, the animated sitcom scored about as well as
the Falcons.
In the wake of "South Park," it seems like every network
wants to program edgy, adult cartoons. FOX, a network which seems
to be betting the farm on such animated fare this season, is adding
three new toons to its nightly line-up. Eddie Murphy's stop-motion
opus, "The P.J.s," has already premiered. Matt Groening's
long-awaited (and long-delayed) sci-fi series "Futurama"
is slated to bow sometime in March. "The Family Guy,"
which debuted after the Super Bowl and will join the regular schedule
next month, rounds out FOX's cartoon-heavy schedule (along with
"King of the Hill" and "The Simpsons"). I
doubt the network can support five prime-time toons, and I can
tell you right now which one is primed for the chop. (Hint: Eddie
and Matt have no reason to sweat.)
The brainchild of 25-year-old animator Seth MacFarlane, "The
Family Guy" has been described as a mixture of "The
Simpsons" and "Married ... With Children." In fact,
that's exactly what it is. There's a bloated, bungling,
beer-drinking father, a doting wife, an underachieving older son,
a mopey younger daughter, a baby and a dog. Sound like any other
animated families you know? Possibly ones already ensconced on
FOX? Toss in some of the foul-mouthed familial animosity of "Married
... With Children," and you've got "Family Guy"
to a T.
Surely FOX isn't pinning all its hopes on this redundant and generally
laughless series. The initial show featured some weak attempts
at the frantic joke-a-minute pace of "The Simpsons"--the
result was more spastic incoherence than rapid-fire humor. "The
Simpsons" has taken years to work up to its current visual
and verbal pacing. Trying to come out of the gate at this breakneck
speed is not advisable. The plot for the first episode (dad gets
fired, doesn't have the courage to tell his wife and ends up bilking
welfare for thousands, thanks to a computer error) seemed recycled
straight out of "The Simpsons'" trash can.
There were several attempts at originality on display in the series--nearly
all of which failed. The family dog, for example, is smart and
can talk. (Nice try, but I saw that last week on UPN's "Dilbert.")
The baby is an evil genius and spends the entire show trying to
murder his mother (a joke that, I must confess, totally escapes
me).
I give "The Family Guy" about three weeks before viewers
file for divorce and the show ends up in the same short-lived
animated purgatory as "Stressed Eric" and "Fish
Police."