Hollywood has got a collective case of the warm fuzzies these
days. Oscar time always brings out the philanthropist in Tinseltown,
and every November through January, we're guaranteed to catch
plenty of PC proselytizing at our local cineplex. All the money-hungry
studio execs can feel like they're doing God's work (and maybe
earning a spot on Santa's "good" list) by turning out
munificent message movies like Steven Spielberg's Amistad or
Martin Scorsese's Kundun. Certainly, films have the ability
to educate as well as entertain, and what more influential industry
to steer the course of public opinion than Hollywood's dream factory?
More and more, however, these films have begun to feel rather
crass in their ability to jump on the latest Hollywood bandwagon.
A few years ago, Hollywood's focus du jour was AIDS, and
we were treated to a flurry of AIDS-related dramas; now that the
"trend" has passed, you aren't likely to see so much
as a red ribbon on Rodeo Drive. Hollywood's newest cause célèbre
is the liberation of Tibet, and this winter both Jean-Jacques
Annaud's Seven Years in Tibet and Martin Scorsese's Kundun
nearly found themselves battling for box office space with almost
identical topics.
Scorsese's take on the life and times of the Dalai Lama is certainly
beautiful and undoubtedly heart-felt. Unfortunately, Scorsese's
expended so much energy being reverent to his subject matter,
that he's forgotten to inject any vigor into the proceedings.
Known mostly for his blood-and-obscenity-laced, New York City-based
crime films (Mean Streets, Taxi Driver), Scorsese
seems a tad out of place laying garlands at the feet of the Buddha.
Still, Scorsese does manage to sneak in one bodily dismemberment
and a lot of male bonding, which must have made him feel a little
bit more at home. The script by Melissa Mathison (known primarily
for writing E.T. The Extraterrestrial and secondarily for
marrying Harrison Ford) touches all the important bases but fails
to alleviate the central problem in bringing the spiritual leader's
tale to the big screen--there's simply no dramatic conflict here.
Strange, considering all the horrors visited upon his Himalayan
homeland. At the age of two and a half, young Tenzin Gyatso was
recognized as the 14th incarnation of the Dalai Lama and promptly
handed his position as the secular and spiritual leader of all
Tibet. Kundun, as he was called, spent his entire life isolated
in the Holy City of Lhasa being instructed as a monk. In the 1950s,
the Chinese government completely devastated Tibet, snatching
its land and slaughtering its people. Unfortunately, the highly
cloistered Dalai Lama never witnessed any of the atrocities brought
upon his people firsthand. Scorsese tosses in a couple bloody
"visions" for the Dalai Lama to experience, but it's
hard to get a handle on what really happened to Tibet by focusing
entirely on the Dalai Lama. When the Chinese finally took over,
he left the country. End of story.
By insisting on using nothing but actual Tibetans, Scorsese has
certainly achieved an admirable level of accuracy. All of the
actors, none of them professional, are quite believable. Morocco
seems to have served as a workable and picturesque substitute
for the mountains of Tibet. And scenes of the dazzling, intricate
Tibetan art of sandpainting are woven dream-like throughout the
film. Scorsese has certainly created a beautiful, loving portrait
of this lost nation and its deeply spiritual people.
Without a doubt, this is a story that needs repeating. China's
virtual extermination of Tibet was an absolute atrocity and should
be brought to light all across the world. If you know nothing
about Tibet (and few do), then Kundun is not the worst
place to begin. But--flawed though it was--I actually found Seven
Years in Tibet to be a more compelling portrait of the Dalai
Lama and his nation. Filtering this exquisitely foreign land through
the eyes of a Westerner (even if he was a Nazi) may have been
the best way to guide an audience. Seven Years was also
a better film dramatically, giving us a flawed hero with a crucial
character arc (from blind narcissism to wide-eyed compassion)
through which we, the viewers, were able to achieve enlightenment.
The Dalai Lama, being the perfect and unflawed incarnation of
the Buddha of Compassion, isn't exactly the easiest protagonist
to
identify with.
I've already received a certain amount of flak for daring to criticize
this film--as if disliking the film amounted to disliking the
Tibetan people. As if finding flaw in a film was tantamount to
a lack of compassion for the people it depicts. There is a difference
between movies and real life. Real life rarely has a point. It
just is. Movies, though, do have a point. They are works
of art. In two scant hours, they must engage, entertain and enlighten.
Movies that imitate life, as Scorsese's Kundun does,
must root out the dramatic heart of their subject. Kundun remains
like a technically proficient painting--gorgeous and well-done--but
inert and emotionally distanced from its subject.