Few filmmakers today truly understand the mythic nature of film.
While it's true that Hollywood has built its empire on hashing
and rehashing the same stories, it's also true that movies have
a particular power to tell a certain type of story. The
relatively short and exceptionally visual nature of film makes
it the perfect medium for telling stories of heroic, mythic and
iconic proportions. The kind of legends that primitive man once
related around the campfire--tales of stalwart heroes, snarling
villains and basic human lessons learned--are the very stories
that movies do best. One of the filmmakers who truly understood
this mythic nature was Japanese director Akira Kurosawa. Kurosawa's
universal storylines have been passed down through the years from
samurai films (The Seven Samurai) to westerns (The Magnificent
Seven) to science fiction (Battle Beyond the Stars)
with little alteration in tone or message.
Another filmmaker who understood was Italian director Sergio Leone.
Leone's wonderfully iconic westerns (often starring Clint Eastwood
as The Man With No Name) were virtual models of anthropologist
Joseph Campbell's "Hero With a Thousand Faces" concept.
Leone's The Good, The Bad and The Ugly (1967), for
example, tells the story of three "heroes" on a quest
for treasure that could have been lifted scene-for-scene from
Arthurian legend or mediaeval fairy tale. Leone became inexorably
linked with Kurosawa when he remade the Japanese director's 1961
samurai saga Yojimbo as a western, entitled A Fistful
of Dollars.
Which brings us, in a roundabout way, to modern-day director Walter
Hill. Hill, in his own way, is quite cognizant of film's mythic
nature. His 1979 film The Warriors is a near perfect adaptation
of the "hero's journey" story that dates back as far
as the 2,000-year-old Scandinavian prose poem Beowulf.
Now Hill is following in Leone's footsteps by remaking Kurosawa's
Yojimbo--this time as a gangster film. The change of venue
seems perfect. In point of fact, Kurosawa "borrowed"
the Yojimbo storyline from Dashiell Hammet's 1928 detective
novel Red Harvest.
In this latest version, Bruce Willis plays "John Smith"
(a slight variation on Eastwood's Man With No Name), a mysterious
gunman on the run to Mexico who stumbles across a dirtwater Texas
border town currently being occupied by two warring factions of
bootleggers. As in the previous two versions, our rather mercenary
hero hires himself out to both sides and basically watches the
carnage unfold.
Willis knows how to do the iconic hero thing. He ought to; he's
had enough practice. It takes a powerful screen presence to fill
these shoes, and Willis has it. The moment we see Clint Eastwood
or Toshiro Mifune step onto the screen, we know they are force
to be reckoned with. Willis is one of the few modern actors capable
of generating that kind of buzz on screen. Willis' voice-over
narration (a lift from American film noir) is well done but detracts
from his mysterious loner status. It's difficult to remain mysterious
when the audience is privy to your innermost thoughts.
The cinematography in Last Man is particularly expressive.
The film adopts the kind of washed-out western dustbowl look often
glimpsed in Edward Hopper paintings. The script is effective with
only a few sacrifices of logic (why two warring Chicago gangsters
would be crammed into one tiny town in the middle of nowhere isn't
exactly clear). And as a director, Hill often gets a bit heavy-handed
in driving home his "cinematic myth," but I suppose
he can be forgiven. After all, he's in pretty good company.
Hill has made broad claims that his version is much more like
Yojimbo than Fistful of Dollars (Kurosawa even shares
a "story by" credit on the opening crawl). But Last
Man Standing actually owes a great deal to Leone's 1964 remake
and to Hammett's '28 original. Hill mixes all three versions in
a cinematic blender. The result combines Hammett's original bootlegger
plotline, Kurosawa's iconic characters and symbolic storytelling
and Leone's wild West gunslinging. Hill certainly doesn't shy
away from these precursors. Instead, he freely loots from any
source he can think of: dime novels, comic books, film noir, westerns,
samurai films, even a bit or two from the Bible. The result is
a solid, if familiar, shoot-'em-up with one hell of a lot of history
to back it up.