Trust me, nothing gets a journalist worked-up and misty-eyed quicker
than a discussion about the First Amendment. "The Congress
shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech or of the
press." Quite a heart-tugger, eh? So I suppose you'll have
to forgive me if I go into a film like The People vs. Larry
Flynt with a certain positive predisposition. Any film that
chronicles the battle for free speech is bound to get high marks
around here.
The People tells the true story of Larry K. Flynt--partial
nutjob, occasional born-again Christian and full-time publisher
of Hustler magazine. Flynt, at first glance, seems like
an odd figure for an American hero. Truth be told, he seems like
an odd figure at final glance as well. Flynt is outspoken, opinionated,
perverted and basically a big fat jerk. Flynt, it must be noted,
would be the first to own up to these allegations. If there is
one word that sums up Mr. Flynt, that word would have to be "unapologetic."
In The People vs. Larry Flynt, the title role is bravely
taken up by Woody Harrelson. Harrelson has had some success in
Hollywood flexing his humor and charm is such movies as White
Men Can't Jump. Here Harrelson gets to run full tilt with
one of the more colorful (to say the least) characters in pop
culture. Harrelson mixes perfectly Flynt's good-ol'-boy crudeness
with his nouveau riche lust for life.
The witty and insightful script by Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski
(who cranked out the similarly excellent biopic Ed Wood)
follows Flynt from his early days as a strip club owner in Cincinnati
through his numerous legal battles, his religious conversion,
his paralyzation at the hands of a would-be assassin and his eventual
victory in front of the United States Supreme Court. Many have
criticized this film (sight unseen, of course) for lionizing a
pornographer like Larry Flynt. The film never attempts to portray
Flynt in the golden light of martyrdom. Did Flynt do it all for
the money? Of course he did. The opening scene of the movie shows
a 10-year-old Flynt selling homemade moonshine in the mountains
of Kentucky. We see that from childhood Flynt was A) a businessman
and B) a seller of sin. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, his early
legal battles to distribute his raunchy blue-collar skin mag were
motivated by the almighty dollar.
What many people miss, however, is that Flynt's ultimate battle
before the Supreme Court was not about pornography; it was about
his right to piss off Rev. Jerry Falwell. Falwell had sued Flynt
for libel over a satirical jab in Hustler. What the 1987
Supreme Court case decided was the press' right to criticize or
even satirize public figures. Director Milos Foreman (One Flew
Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Amadeus) knows a thing or two about
men on the edge, and even the courtroom scenes--traditionally
the dullest things you can put on film--are orchestrated with
an energy, an authenticity and an immediacy that simply demands
attention. As irritating as our "hero" may be, it is
downright scary seeing scenes of man being--literally--gagged
in court. Such things don't happen in a "free" country.
Do they? The bottom line is that you don't have to like Larry
Flynt, but you should, on some level, admire him for pushing this
fight as far as he did. The most telling line of the film is when
Flynt says to reporters on the courtroom steps, "If the law
protects a scumbag like me, then it protects all of us."
All I can say is "Amen."
Supporting performances are uniformly great. James Carville, Crispin
Glover and even Larry Flynt himself all show up in clever cameos.
Courtney Love does a smashing job as Flynt's stripper bride Althea
Leisure, but I expected no less of her. She'll be a star to watch
out for in years to come. Most outstanding, perhaps, is newcomer
Edward Norton as Flynt's lawyer. Norton is astoundingly natural
in the role. His speeches never once feel like "speeches."
He's also got the least controversial role, which may figure in
heavily come Oscar time.
So, predisposition aside, I would have to say that The People
vs. Larry Flynt is brilliantly scripted, perfectly acted and
painted onto the screen by the brushstrokes of a masterful director.
Never pedantic or preachy, The People is simply the best
discussion of an "issue" I've ever seen in film form.
Sure, it's bound to be controversial. But controversy is good.
It opens up discussion, it raises issues--and it occasionally
sells a few magazines.