I was talking recently to a friend who moved to Los Angeles after spending
several years living the city mouse life in New York. Reflecting on his new
home, he said it wasn't such a bad place, "as long as you can accept that
everybody spends a lot of time worrying about how they look, and looking
to see how you look. In Manhattan, people are always trying to show off their
brains. In L.A., they show off their looks."
Of course, the corollary to the smog city's obsession with appearance is
that nothing is really what it looks like. Southern California, home of
Hollywood, Disneyland, and Ronald Reagan, is our national capital of illusion.
Artifice is its stock in trade and its main export. The faces, busts, and
buttocks you see walking down the street are no more real than Luke Skywalker's
land-speeder or a film producer's promise to read your screenplay. Nobody
means what they say and everybody knows it, which absolves anybody of ever
having to show the face behind the mask. It's a culture that thrives on surfaces
because it's afraid of what might be underneath.
The new thriller L.A. Confidential plays off that dark superficiality,
off the difference between the way things seem and the way they really are.
Set in 1950s Hollywood, it's a clever detective yarn about celebrity, duplicity,
and the importance of appearances. And if it ultimately seems a little hollow,
that's at least in keeping with its theme.
The movie, adapted from James Ellroy's novel by director Curtis Hanson, is
unusual in a lot of ways, not least of which is its refusal to give us a
"good guy." Instead, we get three intriguing but deeply flawed protagonists,
all of them detectives with the Los Angeles Police Department. First, there's
Jack (Kevin Spacey), a smug sergeant who makes his name busting movie stars
for sex and drug offenses, most of which he's tipped to by tabloid editor
Sid Hudgeons (Danny DeVito). Jack's high profile has landed him a job he
enjoys more than any beat-pounding police worktechnical adviser to
a police drama called Badge of Honor (a deliberate mirror of the LAPD's
real-life collaboration with Dragnet). Jack's the ultimate L.A.
cophe really is a policeman, but he'd rather play one on TV.
He's complemented in the narrative by two young officers who at first seem
like polar oppositesthe straight-arrow Exley (Guy Pearce) and the violent
Bud (Russell Crowe). Exley's an apple-polishing do-gooder trying to fulfill
the legacy of a father who was shot down in the line of police duty. Bud's
a troubled loner with a penchant for roughing up wife-beaters.
The trio is thrown together when eight people, including Bud's ex-partner,
are massacred in an all-night diner (the discovery of the bodies is one of
the movie's many smartly rendered noir homagesit's Edward Hopper's
Nighthawks come to a bad end). For reasons of their own, and independent
of each other, all three cops start investigating the shootings, which turn
out to have something to do with a high-stakes prostitution ring, a suitcase
of missing heroin, and some dark secrets about the LAPD itself.
The sinister police department, in effect, serves as the movie's stand-in
for all of Los Angeles. On the surface, it's all propriety and "just the
facts" efficiency, a model of modern law enforcement for a model modern city.
But from savage prisoner beatings (obvious shades of Rodney King) to the
department's willingness to rewrite events to suit its own public relations
purposes, this is an outfit where dubious ends are used to justify brutal
means. Without overstating the point, the movie draws a clear line from its
hawk-nosed, authoritarian police captain (James Cromwell, who's parlayed
his endearing stint in Babe into a string of strong character roles)
to the equally image- and power-obsessed Darryl Gates.
The department isn't the only thing that's not what it seems. There's Lynn
(Kim Basinger, acting for a change), a call girl who works for a mysterious
service that hawks hookers sculpted to look like movie stars (Lynn is supposed
to be Veronica Lake, another noir namecheck). There's Ellis Lowe (Ron
Rifkin), the district attorney, who talks up public morals and then slinks
off to tryst with young men in seedy motels. And there are Jack, Exley, and
Bud, who all turn out to be different than they first appear. About the only
person in the movie who doesn't evolve before our eyes is DeVito, who attacks
his sleazy role with ruthless glee.
The cast is terrific (especially Australian actors Pearce and Crowe, who
hold their own with the fiendishly talented Spacey), and the dialogue and
score are crisp in an intentionally pulpy way. The only problem with the
film is a level of cool detachment throughout, which ends up making it seem
like a merely good movie trying to be a great one. It's not so much that
there aren't any really likable charactersit's that Hanson is so caught
up in exposing the movie's many layers of deception that he doesn't bother
to give it much of a heart. It all feels a little cold, which makes for an
entertaining film that never quite becomes engrossing, a complex thriller
that's easy to enjoy but hard to get passionate about. But then, they don't
have passion in L.A., do they?