Almost 33 years after initially falling in love with Julie
Christie, I realized as I viewed her new film Afterglow that I was falling in love all
over again with Julie Christie. Then, she was the wide-eyed, bekerchiefed Lara of Dr.
Zhivago and the wistful, desperately glamorous model in Darling (for which she won the
Academy Award for best actress), and I was 16. Since that time, both Julie and I have been
around the block a few times. Her face is artfully, and ever so slightly, touched up; my
hair is white. But the strong feeling that her riveting performance in Afterglow evokes is
not mere nostalgia nor some middle-aged desire to recherche le temps perdu. It is how her
longtime fans are likely to appreciate Christie now that is of the essence. Thirty-three
years ago, American teens found her sultry New Wave English looks either the stuff of
exotic fantasies or the ultimate role model for hair-frosting and sang froid stylishness.
It is we who have matured. Even though the Christie of Afterglow is more interestingly
attractive, intelligently sexy, and husky-voiced than ever before, we are better able at
this perspective to see that she is a fine, fine actor, and one of the most satisfyingly
watchable film stars of the past three decades.
At one point in Alan Rudolphs absorbing and entertaining new film, someone asks
Christies character Phyllis Mann, Oh, are you an actress? With a flash
of that fabulous grin, unconsciously sharp timing and painfully self-conscious irony, she
rasps: All the time. Phyllis knows, in a mid-life best described as pleasantly
bitter, that the modest talent that led to her only claim to fame years ago, as a
minor movie queen in B-minus (mostly horror) movies has also been the primary bane
of her existence. Rudolph explores, through an odd sequence of coincidental events, what
it takes to break her out of her latest, long-running gig as a frustrated wife and failed
mother, a beautiful woman in her early 50s whose tragedy is that she actually no longer
has a role to play, and who drifts, watching videos of her old movies and dodging the
threat of any real emotion with self-deprecating wit and too much gin.
With Afterglow, writer-director Rudolph
continues to hack out his own distinctive path through our sulphurous urban angst and the
postmodern moral and cultural detritus of our times. (He has, on occasion, lost his way,
as those who managed to sit through his Love at Large a few years back will remember.)
Afterglow, produced by his mentor Robert Altman, is Rudolphs most compelling film to
date, marking a subtle but substantial advance over his previous best, 1984s Choose
Me. Here we are treated to the same lush visual vocabulary, the same cool affect that
somehow manages to quicken rather than alienate. Afterglow is a wonderful mood piece; but
it is more than that. Integrating coherently Rudolphs dreamy, bracingly eccentric
style, his sense of societal anomie, and his writings oblique narrative
investigations into human relationships, Afterglow takes great cinematic risks. What gives
the film its own afterglow is the grace with which Rudolph manages to keep his three-ring
circus balanced. We leave the theatre not only not particularly bothered but actually
invigorated by his unique capacity for juggling icy surrealism with an almost giddy
lyricism, and clinical dissections of the human heart with plot elements straight out of
Restoration farce.
The ruefully smoldering heart of Afterglow
is Christies performance which short of a possible Brit-split
vote benefiting Helen Hunt should win her the 1997 Oscar for best actress.
Also helping Rudolph hold this odd, fascinating, and ultimately moving entertainment
together are the three other lead actors: Nick Nolte as Phyllis cheerfully
philandering handyman husband, Lucky, and Lara Flynn Boyle (of televisions Twin
Peaks) and Jonny Lee Miller (Trainspotting) as a young couple facing their own marital
challenges. More accurately, it is the fact that the couples are not facing what ails them
that leads them astray (albeit, eventually, to a sort of enlightenment). Millers
character, Jeffrey, a prissy young financier whose emotional circuits are clogged by his
pretensions to a cold perfection of high-tech, hard-edge style, seeks to revive himself
through an affair with Phyllis. Her maturity and romantic air of loss have the effect of
turning the jaded young man into a positively medieval, chivalric knight. Concurrently
with each pairing unbeknownst to the other Noltes Lucky has struck up
a liaison with Boyles lonely young wife, Marianne.
What begins as a cold examination of
estrangement, set against the gray stone buildings and wintry sunsets of Montreal (and
musically edged by that master of film-score chill, Mark Isham) ends, after all is said
and done, as something quite different. The characters have come to a new place, and so
have we. From a film of high artifice, with a vivifying sense of something rather magical,
some real-life lessons have been learned about breaking free, and about the even harder
business of breaking through of expressing need and forgiveness. As one character
in Afterglow (speaking, one suspects, for the filmmaker himself) repeatedly exhorts:
Take a flying leap into the future.
--Hadley Hury
Interviews
Afterglow 
Full Length Reviews
Afterglow 
Afterglow 
Afterglow 
Afterglow 
Capsule Reviews
Afterglow 
Other Films by Alan Rudolph
Breakfast of Champions 
Mrs. Parker and the Vicious Circle 
Film Vault Suggested Links
Meet Joe Black 
Something to Talk About 
No Looking Back 
Related Merchandise
Search for related videos at Reel.com
Search for more by Alan Rudolph at Reel.com
Search for related books at Amazon.com
Search for related music at Amazon.com
Rate this Film
If you don't want to vote on a film yet, and would like to know how
others voted, leave the rating selection as "Vote Here" and then click the
Cast Vote button.
|