Hollywood is a mirror factory. Its an industry currently governed
by the assumption that what we desire most out of movies is to
see ourselves reflected back, and for the reflection to be flattering.
Its an assumption that guides how films are made (or not made),
how theyre marketed, and where theyre shown (or not shown).
Ours is a cinema that separates us, that promotes our solipsism
and that reinforces our xenophobia. So its a shame that Hollywood
films, and the boutique indies that are usually about as much
of an alternative to Hollywood orthodoxy as Democrats are to Republicans,
are all most theatregoers are allowed to see because films can
make great windows.
Anna, a documentary from Russian director Nikita Mikhalkov that
has recently been released on video from New Yorker, is a terrific
window film. Both intimately personal and epic in its historical
sweep, it provides a look at the fall of the Soviet Union that
differs from any most Americans have ever experienced, no matter
how committed they might be to CNN or PBS.
Anna is director Mikhalkovs daughter (Mikhalkov is perhaps best
known in the States, if at all, for his 1994 film Burnt by the
Sun, which won the Oscar for best foreign-language film), and
the film juxtaposes her growth from age 6 in 1980 to age 17 in
1991 with the twilight of the Soviet Union. When Mikhalkov began
this project, a deeply polemical and ambivalent home movie, during
the repressive Brezhnev era, it was an illegal act. Home-movie
cameras were not allowed, so the film was shot with professional
equipment, and the film itself had to be either smuggled in or
bought on the black market.
Mikhalkovs method is to interview his daughter once a year during
this period, asking the same five simple questions each time:
What do you love most? What do you hate most? What scares you?
What do you want more than anything? What do you expect from life?
At age 6 Anna is a typical child sweet, silly, completely unselfconscious.
Her great fear is a witch and she hates borscht. By the next interview,
at age 7, her answers have changed dramatically. Anna has started
school, and, as was required, has joined the Young Pioneers
a sort of Communist youth league. Her answers over the next several
years seem to reflect not what she is really thinking, but what
she is expected to think.
What do you want more than anything? Mikhalkov asks his 7-year-old
daughter as she stands on the hillside field of the familys country
estate. To be intelligent
, she answers,
and to behave
well. Not satisfied with this answer, Mikhalkov presses her,
posing the question again, and she replies, To give good answers.
There is a disturbing realization that political doctrination
has taken hold, and her answers over the next several years take
on a frighteningly distanced consistency. The adolescent Anna
fears War, and desires Peace. As one Russian premier after another
dies (Brezhnev, Andropov, and Chernenko, all within a three-year
period), young Anna mourns the passing of each great leader, even
if she gets confused about who is who. These annual interviews
become a kind of cautious battle for Annas mind and soul, her
behavior backing up Mikhalkovs claims about the artifice needed
to prop up a failed totalitarian regime, resulting in a gap between
its citizens public faces and interior lives.
Using archival footage, Mikhalkov traces the Soviet regime through
Brezhnev to Gorbachev to its collapse. Mikhalkov is deeply critical
of Soviet Communism, but is, at best, ambivalent about the changes
that democratization has brought to his country. It is perhaps
instinctual to identify with a protagonist in a film, and Mikhalkov
is our tour guide in this strange land. But resisting this connection
to Mikhalkov is one of Annas greatest challenges. Do we agree
with him? Do we like him? Hes an aristocrat, and, though no friend
of the Soviet regime, his patriotism seems to point back toward
Czarist Russia rather than toward the promise of Westernized freedoms.
His choice to document only the most decadent and ridiculous of
Western cultural influences (televangelism and sub-Duran Duran
New Wave) shows a troubling conservative streak, but his fear
of cultural imperialism damaging a specifically Russian sensibility
is understandable.
As the film ends, with Russia in a state of upheaval that seems
to have only worsened in the intervening years, Mikhalkov interviews
his daughter for the last time. Now 17 and preparing to move to
Switzerland for college, she stands in the same field as she did
when she was 7, and answers the same questions. Shes a pensive,
timid teenager now, but one who is coming to grips with her countrys
deceitful past and dangerously unstable present. She says that
the land itself is most important to her, the very field she stands
on, and insists that she will return to Russia after school, but
cant hold back tears while saying so.
Why did Anna, a young girl aged 17, in need of nothing, start
crying as she talked about her country? Mikhalkov asks in his
voice-over narration. But he leaves the question unanswered. Instead
he turns toward his younger daughter Nadia, standing in the field,
and the same age as Anna when this film began. What scares you?
he asks. Im mainly scared of school, the young girl replies.
And so the film ends with the promise of a sequel, and another
chapter in the story of what Mikhalkov calls our great and unfortunate
land.
(New Yorker Films, 1-800-447-0196)