There has been much
comment about L.A. Confidential's style -- particularly
the palpable authenticity of its sense of time (it is set in the
early 1950s) -- and deservedly so. From the upholstery on a
diner's banquettes to the bands on men's hats, from the
snout-nosed Ford coupes on the streets to Kay Starr crooning on
the airwaves, the production design by Jeannine Oppwall and
costumes by Ruth Myers are seamlessly accurate. The idiom of the
dialogue -- refashioned from James Ellroy's thriller by
Curtis Hanson and Brian
Helgeland -- snaps with the breezy bebop slang of the '50s,
punctuated here and there by monosyllabic tough-guyisms still in
post-War favor. Hanson, who also directs, and cinematographer
Dante Spinotti unfurl the movie with a perfect texture and pace
-- equal parts seedy film noir and brassy "Show of
Shows" -- that catches that very instant when America (and
most emblematically, Hollywood) was poised between the school of
hard knocks (the Depression and the War) and a jarring array of
social revolutions (the '60s and beyond). If the 1950s may be
described as a period for self-satisfaction -- a time simply to
keep up with the Joneses and contemplate our blessings -- then
certainly no one aided and abetted our strictly enforced
sentimentality more avidly than did Hollywood. The conformist
morality of its product was never more sanctioning -- or
hypocritical. The world of Written on the Wind and Magnificent
Obsession did not invite an introspective splitting of the
fine hairs of conscience; it was a broad-brush canvas, a
midnight-or-noon world of fraught but tight-lipped consensus. L.A.
Confidential is not merely appropriately named; it is, like
many a fine film or novel, so steeped in its sense of place that
it is impossible to imagine the story coming to life anywhere
else. Its themes -- appearance vs. reality, corruption, heroism,
and love's redemption -- are universal. And the fact that these
forces are at war for the soul of an urban police department
seems broadly applicable: After decades of serial television and
investigative news stories, the institution has become one of our
most visible moral battlegrounds, a microcosm of society's fault
lines. Not only is L.A. Confidential not just an easily
transplantable NYPD episode or Serpico gone south,
its title city transcends its function of background to become of
the primary characters. Not one of the film's intricately woven
plot lines could breathe anywhere but in the hot house atmosphere
of La La Land; none of the story's central characters would
confront their demons or their dreams as they do here,
interacting with the schizophrenic entity that has become the
church and state of illusory values. L.A. Confidential
brings us face to face with Los Angeles, home to human
expatriates in exile from themselves, city of angels rising and
descending, improbable earth mother, waterless, glamorous,
putrefied. This unique city is as uniquely inescapable in a
consideration of this film's impact as it was in such memorably
L.A.-centric works as In a Lonely Place, Sunset
Boulevard, The Bad and the Beautiful, Day of the
Locust, Chinatown, Tequila Sunrise, and The
Player. (Not to mention that Jacobean soap opera, the
O.J.Simpson case.)
At the heart of L.A. Confidential
is the relationship between Bud White (Russell Crowe), a tough,
sad-eyed, loyal young cop who wants to do the right thing but is
painfully suspended in a state of suppressed fury by department
superiors who use his brawn for their back-room intimidation
sessions, and Ed Exley (Guy Pearce), a rule-book model officer
whose ambition and unyielding standards do not make him popular
with the rank and file. There's plenty not to like about both.
One of the beauties of the film is that it never rushes our
sympathies; it gives us just enough about each man to interest us
as the film's convoluted plot lines slowly come together for full
gallop to the finish. Only in the final scenes of the film do we
experience -- all the more powerfully for it being something of a
surprise -- a depth of feeling and of respect for them both.
One of their colleagues is Jack
Vincennes (Kevin Spacey), a guy who's gotten so smooth he can't
stop himself from outrageous displays of verbal smarminess --
even though we can see there's an acrid taste of self-loathing,
or at least self-fatigue, when he does it. Vincennes is adviser
to the TV cop show Badge of Honor and something of a minor
celebrity. He takes small pay-offs and we sense that his inner
barometer about what's too small to bother with or too vile to
touch is less reliable than it used to be. He turns his head so
often it's in a perpetual swivel. Spacey is extraordinarily
adroit at making Vincennes, at once, faintly disgusting and
touchingly sympathetic. When he tries to turn what we know could
be a big corner in his life, we root for him; and it hurts when
he answers Exley's question about why he became a cop. It's
Spacey's most galvanizing moment: There's an attempt at the usual
glibness, followed by a wide-eyed, wordless, straining at truth;
followed by the actual, crushing truth: "I don't
remember." Vincennes is the perfect cop for a world founded
on duplicity; he's acting, and he's been acting for so long that
he's forgotten to remember where all the bodies are buried. Too
late he realizes that among them is his own.
Danny DeVito is exuberantly trashy as
Sid Hudgens, verminish reporter for Hush-Hush magazine. He
and Vincennes occasionally trade favors: Jack'll set up the vice
bust of a starlet and tip Sid to be there with his cameras. James
Cromwell plays Lieutenant Dudley Smith as a benign Irish
patriarch and, amazingly, does so without resorting to cliche.
It's a cunningly crafted performance and should dispel the
notion, held in some quarters, that his Oscar nomination three
years ago for his role as the farmer in Babe was a fluke.
As Pierce Patchett, an elegantly tailored Brentwood gentleman who
runs a high-class string of hookers -- whom he sends to
hairdressers or even plastic surgeons to heighten their
resemblance to stars of the day -- David Straitharn continues a
string of low-key, but vividly eccentric, performances that are
mesmerizing in their variety.
It's hard to imagine any two actors
being more suited, more innately right, than Crowe and Pearce for
the two leads. Which is precisely the point. In one of the
smarter moves made on any major film this year, Hanson wisely
avoided using better-known stars (and managed to talk the
producers into it). The payoff for the audience is enormous; we
are allowed to experience fully our seduction by the film's
suspense, its sensuousness, its ideas -- because we are not
distracted with projecting star expectations onto the personas on
the screen. There's nothing to get in the way of the good work
here, and it's very good, indeed; the characterizations are
finely drawn. Even the physical opposition of the actors' good
looks have room to work -- Crowe's heaviness of experience sits
uneasily on his brow; Pearce's chiseled righteousness is matched
by his cheekbones.
In another instance, it's hard to
imagine how what the audience does know about an actor's
historical baggage could add more to a performance.The face that
is most familiar among the cast of L.A. Confidential
belongs to Kim Basinger. Her performance as Lynn Bracken, a
Veronica Lake lookalike from Patchett's agency, accrues its
emotional heft precisely because moviegoers have watched her
migration in recent years from blonde sexpot, to would-be
dramatic and comedic actor, to owner of a small town in Georgia,
to bankruptcy and box-office poison after being sued for conduct
deemed unbecoming by a major studio, to marriage to Alec Baldwin,
motherhood, and a measured, modest come-back. It's all there. And
it makes her love for Officer White nearly unbearable in its
wounded tough-cookie need.
Hanson and Helgeland have handled the
neat convolutions of Ellroy's crime thriller with cinematic
finesse, and even though Hanson's sense of pace and stylistic
integrity is sinuous and sophisticated, the real fuel here -- as
in the noir classics of the '40s and early '50s -- is emotion.
Last week, speaking at the fifth Film Preservation Festival,
director Martin Scorsese said of those films: "They were
about descending into a labyrinth where anything can happen,
including the death of the protagonist."
For 135 minutes, L.A. Confidential
takes us with it on such a descent, and not one frame of this
remarkable film tips its hand as to whether we'll go to hell or,
if we do, whether we'll come back. We end up on the edge of our
seat, yearning for two protagonists, both anti-heroes -- one of
whom, not long before, we'd taken to be a psychotic thug and the
other a reptilian prig -- to gun their way to a compromised moral
victory, to make us believe again in at least the possibility of
trust.
Odd that for many who see this movie --
in which the city of movies looms so large, its white hot light
streaked with the shadows of palm trees and ghosted with
celluloid shadows -- it may be, in the end, not other movies
about L.A. or the movies that come first to mind. It might well
be a film made in 1952 -- High Noon -- another exploration
of the American Dream, violent evil, and our constantly reforming
need to find a face, however unlikely, we can trust.
--Hadley Hury
Full Length Reviews
L.A. Confidential 
L.A. Confidential 
L.A. Confidential 
Capsule Reviews
L.A. Confidential 
L.A. Confidential 
Other Films by Curtis Hanson
The River Wild 
Film Vault Suggested Links
Desperate Measures 
Ransom 
La Cucaracha 
Related Merchandise
Search for related videos at Reel.com
Search for more by Curtis Hanson at Reel.com
Search for related books at Amazon.com
Search for related music at Amazon.com
Rate this Film
If you don't want to vote on a film yet, and would like to know how
others voted, leave the rating selection as "Vote Here" and then click the
Cast Vote button.
|