Gangster movies are a law-abiding citizen's version of porn--a
film-looped ritual that endlessly spools out fantasies of rebellion, of
brute force and money, of death. The Code-era gangster classics of the '30s
hid behind a moral smoke screen to deliver doses of lowdown thrills. You
still got to see lawbreakers raise hell and bang bang bang, and as long as
justice prevailed before "The End," your appetite for destruction was
sated, not challenged. Bonnie and Clyde, which shows Tuesday and
Wednesday in a special engagement at Sarratt, calls into question just what
the hell we find so thrilling.
Bonnie and Clyde is quintessentially the product of a country
where guns are props in the national playhouse, from the time a kid is old
enough to play cops-and-robbers. At the same time, the movie is shrewd
enough to wonder what kind of impact that has on our notions of reality and
fiction, law and order, right and wrong. As such, Bonnie and Clyde
may not be the greatest American movie--let's not even play that parlor
game--but you could certainly make a case for it as the great American
movie, the one that best represents our character and our cinema, warts and
all. Even after 31 years, after countless imitations and the numbing
escalation of movie violence, its basic contradictions remain more
pertinent than ever. How can we demonize crime as citizens and romanticize
criminals as moviegoers?
First and foremost, Bonnie and Clyde is a great gangster movie
about two people who imagine themselves as the stars of a gangster movie.
Everything in it calls to mind the outlaw classics of the 1930s, only
fonder and dreamier. No Little Caesar or Scarface ever looked as flawlessly
handsome as Warren Beatty's Clyde Barrow; no moll ever gave off anything
like the heat of Faye Dunaway's Bonnie Parker. The gleaming roadsters, the
vintage fashions (which sparked a short-lived craze)--Burnett Guffey's
camera polishes them all to a stylized gloss that evokes the world through
a celluloid curtain. Car chases cut from real cars to obviously fake
process shots; the fleeing robbers see themselves riding to glory against a
back-projection screen. A scene in a movie theater captures the disparity
between the movie world and their life of crime. Onscreen, dancing chorines
sing "We're in the Money" in a Busby Berkeley production number. In the
audience, Clyde fatmouths about killing a bank guard--the first of many
killings to come.
What isn't stylized is the violence. It isn't poetic, as in The Wild
Bunch; it's blunt and ugly. The director, Arthur Penn, undercuts the
rollicking tone of the early scenes with ominous hints: credits that fade
to blood-red, a splash of ketchup on Bonnie's blouse. A clerk with a
cleaver bolts into the frame behind Clyde as he holds up a grocery,
deliberately violating the lighthearted mood, and from then on the violence
is sudden, disruptive, and as harsh as the rest of Bonnie and Clyde's world
is idealized. The outlaws pose for photos with guns and write their own
ballad, but the grubby reality constantly undermines the
glamour--matinee-idol Clyde is an impotent coward, beautiful Bonnie is a
vicious crook, and the people they kill look like us. We start out admiring
the outlaws, and they respond by shoving their shiny guns back in our
faces. In the notorious ending, a masterpiece of montage in editor Dede
Allen's hands, a firing squad brutally punctures their delusions with a
hail of machine-gun fire.
Ironically enough, it was the seriousness of the violence that
infuriated reviewers when Bonnie and Clyde was released in 1967.
(Many of them turned about-face when the movie became a blockbuster and a
critical cause cl¸bre.) The blood was nothing new, and neither was the
brutality. Herschell Gordon Lewis' far grislier cheapies had been playing
drive-ins for years, and one of the biggest hits the same year was Robert
Aldrich's The Dirty Dozen, which tossed in a near-rape and several
beatings along with a substantially higher body count.
But those movies didn't explode their cartoonish use of bloodshed as
entertainment the way Bonnie and Clyde did. Bonnie and Clyde
jumbled humor and horror in ways that recalled the groundbreaking thriller
pastiches of the French New Wave--whose leading lights, Jean-Luc Godard and
Fran¨ois Truffaut, were initially offered the David Newman-Robert Benton
script by producer Beatty. (A lyrical slow-motion shot of a child tumbling
down a hill, an homage to Truffaut's Shoot the Piano Player, gives a
glimpse of the film that might've been.) The movie's moral ambiguity isn't
about killing; it's about bank-robbing. The movie immerses us so deeply in
the delusions of its bank-robber heroes that it makes banks deserving
targets, stick-ups fun, and lawmen bloodthirsty bullies. It takes bullets
to snap us out of it.
The many caper movies that followed Bonnie and Clyde abandoned
subjective subtleties altogether. The movie's careful ironic remove gave
way to an easy cynicism that made heroes of criminals, patsies of working
stiffs, and villains of lawmen. By the time you get to something as corrupt
as the recent Set It Off, in which the filmmakers' casual
exploitation of economic troubles winds up glorifying armed robbery, you
see violence reduced to window dressing, to affectless spectacle that
leaves an audience feeling numb. As even a cursory look shows today, that's
one crime nobody can pin on Bonnie and Clyde.