A guy I was arguing with one time claimed I wasn't judging The
Godfather Part III on its own merits, but rather unfairly in comparison
to the classic Godfather and Godfather II. That may be, I
said, but that's what happens when you call your film The Godfather.
City of Angels skirts this issue. Although it's an Americanized
remake of Wings of Desire, Wim Wenders' classic film about angels
over walled Berlin, the filmmakers bend over backwards to avoid comparison
by changing the title and avoiding mention of the source material until the
closing credits.
Although they're not really the same story, the two movies begin the
same way--following a pair of angels (Nicolas Cage as Seth and Andre
Braugher as Cassiel) as they roam through a city (Los Angeles, in this
case), offering unseen comfort to the troubled souls whose thoughts they
hear in a near-constant stream. But where Wings of Desire stayed
with this concept for almost one plotless hour, City of Angels
tarries for barely 10 minutes. At that point, Seth becomes enchanted with a
compassionate cardiac surgeon (Meg Ryan), and he reveals himself to her in
hopes that she'll fall in love with him.
In the earlier film, the angel remained unseen to the object of his
affection until he "fell"--i.e., became human. Other small details are
different too. Wenders' film opens in black-and-white to reflect the
reduced senses of the angels; the new film is in full color. Also, the
former angel who inspires the protagonist to "fall"--a tangential figure in
the original--has been made integral to the plot. (In the Wenders film, the
former angel was Peter Falk playing "himself"; here it's Dennis Franz,
playing a heart patient named Nathaniel Messenger.)
The biggest change, though, is one of tone. Wings of Desire was a
pitch-perfect piece of mystical ennui that dissolved into a hopeful romance
against the backdrop of a concert by goth-rocker Nick Cave, of all things.
It was a love letter to the possibilities of a post-Cold War Berlin, and it
was as thrilling as cinema as David Bowie's similarly themed Heroes
is as rock 'n' roll. By contrast (and by design), City of Angels is
a lesser thing--a spiritually tinged tearjerker. Even so, by starting the
love story so early in the movie, the makers of City of Angels get
stuck in an unfortunate angel-meets-girl cycle. Since there's seemingly
little complication in the romance of a successful surgeon and her
celestial admirer, the film concocts a last-minute plot twist that will
leave most filmgoers (especially fans of Wenders' film) feeling
betrayed.

Love story
Nicolas Cage and Meg Ryan in City of
Angels
|
Of course, more Americans will see City of Angels than have even
heard of Wings of Desire, and although anyone with a
video-store membership should spend their money on the original instead,
City of Angels does have its merits. Cage, who is different in every
film, reduces his voice to a whisper and his gestures to a shrug--as would
befit a being used to going unseen and unheard. Ryan, who gives the same
open-mouthed, tilted-head, shifty-eyed performance in every film, does so
here to charming effect. And in their small roles, Homicide's
Braugher and NYPD Blue's Franz are a delight (although I kept hoping
they would break off from the movie and start solving crimes).
Still, it's not the simplification of the source material that's
ultimately bothersome, so much as the way this new vision plays out.
City of Angels extols the simple pleasures of life--the taste of
pears, the smell of the ocean, the warmth of the sun, and all the other
sensations that are denied to the angels. Then it suddenly descends into
tragedy, as though these little joys would be meaningless without the
threat of disaster. Which is a completely useless worldview. We enjoy fruit
because it is sweet (and films because they move us). This is a lesson that
Wenders--with his message of hope for hope's sake--was able to convey.
Light is vital because of what it illumines, not just because it chases
away the darkness.