Working-class philosophers, laconic sexpots, and romantic heroes with
criminal pasts populate the films of Hal Hartley. These elements mark
Hartley as a citizen of IndieWorld--that peculiar North American
cinemascape where the dialogue is deadpan, "quirky" vies with "ironic" for
the dominant attitude, and violence occurs routinely when the plot hits a
wall. In fact, Hartley is practically the emperor of this world; in his
films Trust, Simple Men, and Amateur, he fussed over
oddball characters and weird twists, trying to squeeze art out of
affectlessness.
Henry Fool is Hartley's epic. His latest film clocks in at a
quarter past two hours, covers almost eight years in a low-income New York
family's life, and touches on a grand theme: the intersection of art and
celebrity. It's also a low comedy: It opens with one of the leading men
vomiting on a girl's bare behind, and it features a key scene in which the
other leading man proposes to his girlfriend while in the throes of
explosive diarrhea. All this is surely part of the vision.
The title character (played by Thomas Jay Ryan) is a lowlife with
delusions of grandeur. Having spent time in prison for making time with a
minor (who swore she was 18), Henry emerges with a notebook full of
scribblings that he calls "his confession," and with a determination not to
let the real world keep him from pursuing his art. He takes up residence in
the basement of a bizarre nuclear family--suicidal mother Mary Grim (Maria
Porter), her slutty daughter Fay (Parker Posey), and her emotionally
stunted garbageman son, Simon (James Urbaniak).
Henry's detachment from life and his passion for literature fascinate
Simon, so Simon starts a notebook of his own, containing a long, profane
poem. Henry encourages Simon to get the poem published, but no publisher is
interested, just the gaggle of teenage girls who hang out at the local
coffee shop. One of the girls posts the poem on the Internet, and Simon
becomes an overnight sensation, galvanizing America's youth and
scandalizing America's tastemakers.
Hartley's interest in the farcical elements of his story is minimal. As
with all of his films, Henry Fool adopts a bemused attitude toward
the behavior of humans in bizarre situations. This distinctive,
"Hartley-esque" tone is funny at times, but it becomes frustrating that
Hartley is persistently unwilling to portray genuine passion, or to advance
a classifiable point of view toward his characters. With the exception of
Simon, who's a blank, everyone in Henry Fool is a poseur. But
Hartley doesn't seem to be making a point about poseurs, or the perception
of art, or indeed about anything. He's merely using the illusion of
thematic depth to spruce up what is fundamentally a too-laid-back character
comedy.
If Henry Fool succeeds at all, it's because of Hartley's uncanny
knack for creating a distinct community onscreen. His luckless band of
vacant losers tends to grow on you, and I found myself wanting to see how
their little drama played out. But I also found myself wishing that Hartley
would make the effort to bring some order to their chaotic lives, to assign
some significance to their story. Unfortunately, that's not Hartley's
game--he's too cool to care.