A blurb on the back of James Ellroy's L.A. Confidential calls him
"the Master of Post-Modern Crime Fiction," and the best thing you can say
for Ellroy is that that's not the way he reads. Postmodernism these days
connotes a kind of smirky self-reflexivity, when it means anything at all,
and Ellroy is way too cool a craftsman for that kind of guff. L.A.
Confidential, his confoundingly dense, 500-page pulp extravaganza, may
insert real people into a fictional universe, and it may imitate the cheap
staccato of scandal-sheet slugs, but it's no self-amused pastiche. Ellroy's
crime fiction is refreshing precisely because it's so concrete--he doesn't
write as if crime were put on earth just to entertain us.
L.A. Confidential the movie shares that virtue; in style, it could
almost be called post-postmodern. The filmmakers know they're contributing
to a century of crime dramas, but their focus is on the story, not on their
relationship to the canon. In the noir exercises that followed Pulp
Fiction, crime is little more than an excuse for flighty pop-culture
digressions, stylized violence, and winking references to other movies. In
contrast, L.A. Confidential is pleasingly straightforward and square: Dirty
deeds are motivated by the same grubby human motivations--money, jealousy,
lust--that made Mike Hammer swat people senseless. The movie isn't an
homage to hard-boiled detective fiction; it's the real McCoy.
The story hinges upon the rivalry among three LAPD cops: Ed Exley (Guy
Pearce), a straight arrow with ruthless leadership ambitions; Bud White
(Russell Crowe), a flawed bruiser with a dark past and a vendetta against
wife-beaters; and Jack Vincennes (Kevin Spacey), a smoothie who serves as
technical advisor to a Dragnet-style cop show. In the book, their
grudges slow-burn over an entire decade, stoked by a labyrinthine plot that
involves a dozen unsolved cases, a million tangled allegiances, and the
simultaneous rise of the smut industry and of Disneyland.
But the movie doesn't have six hours to tell the postwar history of
Southern California. So screenwriters Brian Helgeland and Curtis Hanson
miraculously trace the action back to a single gruesome event--the slaying
of a half-dozen patrons at an all-night eatery called the Nite Owl. What
follows is classic noir intrigue: a sultry blonde (Kim Basinger) with a
deliberate resemblance to Veronica Lake; a shady procurer (David
Strathairn, looking like a fusion of Walt Disney and Howard Hughes); and,
behind the scenes, a scuzzy scandal-mag editor (Danny DeVito) with a finger
in every poisoned pie.
As director, Hanson doesn't even try to approximate Ellroy's Western
Union prose, too trigger-happy half the time for verbs. (From a near-haiku
of an Ellroy gunfight: "Shrieks from the courtyard; running feet on
gravel.... Over to the men, tasting blood--point-blank head shots.") But
Hanson does the next best thing: He doesn't waste a second of screen time
on anything that doesn't shove the story forward. L.A. Confidential
has a lot of the same elements as last year's lumbering Mulholland
Falls, in which every shot looked suitable for framing, but Hanson
doesn't sit around waiting for us to acknowledge how cool everything is.
The glamourpuss gloss of Dante Spinotti's cinematography becomes a
continuing incidental pleasure, not the point of every scene.
Same goes for the actors, who inhabit the '50s milieu without resorting
to conscious imitation--except for Kevin Spacey, who was encouraged by
Hanson to keep Dean Martin in mind. He saunters through the movie with a
suave charm that offsets the movie's dueling leads, Russell Crowe and Guy
Pearce, two fine Australian actors who deliver smashing performances.
Pearce makes Exley's by-the-book rigidity admirable and obnoxious in equal
amounts--just what the character demands--while Crowe is a thuggish wonder
as Bud White. In a triple-digit supporting cast, James Cromwell erases all
memories of Babe's genial farmer as an opportunistic bastard of an
Irish lieutenant.
L.A. Confidential does a masterful job of condensing Ellroy's
myriad subplots into a workable whole. Trimmed as it is, the plot still
expresses the novelist's vision of Los Angeles, and of America, as a world
that cons itself with illusions of morality and righteousness, while its
leaders traffick behind the scenes in death and depravity. The nobler the
ideal, the bigger the lie. If there's any quibble about what Hanson and
Helgeland kept or deleted, it's that the novel's most resonant plot
thread--a grotesque string of child murders that parallels the rise of a
Disney surrogate--has been excised entirely. So have some of the heroes'
gamier exploits.
But one of the delights of the movie, if you've read the book, is being
able to match wits with the screenwriters, who have done their damnedest to
cram in as much of Ellroy's plotting as possible. To viewers unfamiliar
with the source, L.A. Confidential will seem devilishly complex; to
the book's readers, it'll seem dazzlingly streamlined. They'll both be
right.