Every couple of years, when Albert Brooks releases a new project,
profiles appear in magazines and newspapers dubbing him "the comedian's
comedian." Revered among his peers for his cerebral humor, inventiveness,
and commitment to personal projects, Brooks counts the entertainment elite
as his biggest fans. He's often compared to Woody Allen not only for his
neurotic, self-deprecating style, but also for the relative freedom that
his standing in the industry affords him.
But as Woody found out during his Bergman-fetish, Stardust
Memories years, the laurel wreaths flung by the cognoscenti can become
shackles. Being crowned master of your genre often means that people get
miffed if you strike out in new directions. Even a subtle shift of
theme--from the frustrated lover to the husband facing career crisis, for
example--meets with frowns. "It's not as funny as Modern Romance,"
Brooks' fans mutter as they leave his new film The Muse. And the
critics among them write reviews full of heartfelt disappointment that
their favorite comedian has "lost his edge."
To be fair, few critics are likely to be irony-impaired enough to use
that phrase. After all, The Muse is about a Hollywood screenwriter
whose standard-issue scripts are suddenly getting rejected by studio suits
who repeat the meaningless "lost edge" platitude ad infinitum.
Brooks' character, Steven Phillips, doesn't have the slightest idea where
to look for edge, since he's unaware of ever having possessed it, much less
having misplaced it. It's a situation that Brooks himself might have
experienced after his last film, Mother, was met with sighs and sad
head-shaking from the press.
In the case of The Muse, the negative reaction concerns the way
Brooks develops the movie's can't-miss satirical premise: Steven is
introduced to a muse, one of the nine daughters of Zeus, whose job is to
inspire creative artists. He's ecstatic when Sarah (Sharon Stone) agrees to
take him on as a client, but he quickly chafes under her capricious and
expensive demands. Stripped of its mythological overtones, the premise is
that creativity is a fickle mistress to be placated in the desperate hope
that she will bestow her mysterious gifts. And if that's all there were to
The Muse, the critics would be right to carp that Brooks doesn't
take this idea as far as he should.
Their error is not recognizing that Brooks has several other themes on
his mind. For example, there's a fascinating ribbon of jokes running
through the film about ideas as currency in the entertainment culture;
everyone from writers to executives has a million-dollar idea and is
paranoid about having it "stolen." Steven himself sees ideas strictly in
dollar-sign terms. The Oscar he craves doesn't signify integrity or genius,
just success and marketability. He doesn't employ his muse to make great
art; he wants a big summer comedy hit.
When Steven's wife Laura (Andie MacDowell) takes the muse's advice and
starts her own cookie company, Steven is apoplectic. The reasons he gives
for his anger have to do with needing the muse for his own work; the
unspoken reasons have to do with jealousy. But there's a further level of
subtext. Steven writes because it's the one skill he has to support his
family. The suggestion that his wife might become a creative success out of
passion rather than mercenary need, supplanting him and proving his talent
petty, fills him with fear.
The Muse, while consistently funny, doesn't register as many
belly laughs as the work that made Brooks famous. But Brooks is developing
new characters to express himself, and if jokes are sacrificed for deeper
reflection on family, work, and self-image, audiences are the richer for
it. Those arriving without labels and preconceptions pinned on the
filmmaker won't make the critics' mistake. They'll see a film rather than a
bid for more worthless laurels.