Orson Welles suffered from the career equivalent of progenia, the
disease that prematurely accelerates the aging process. As a two-year-old
in Kenosha, Wisc., he was pronounced a genius. At age 16, he was drawing
ovations in adult roles at Dublin's Gate Theater. By the time Welles made
Citizen Kane 10 years later in 1941, he had already achieved renown
as a stage actor, a director, the founder of a theater company, and a radio
star. Yet each new triumph only seemed to bring greater risks--of failure,
of disappointment. Radio was considered a lesser medium than theater, the
site of Welles' early successes, and movies were regarded as essentially
flashy and shallow. It's telling that when Welles made his film debut, as a
young man of 26, he was already playing a fallen giant whose greatest years
lay behind him.
Far too early in a brilliant career, Kane became a
self-fulfilling prophecy. Welles' subsequent films were butchered (The
Magnificent Ambersons), panned (The Lady from Shanghai), or
hampered by lack of financing (Othello); he left a legacy of
unproduced scripts and unfinished projects. By the late 1950s, Welles
couldn't get funding for his own infrequent films outside Europe; in
Hollywood he could only get work as an actor, mostly in glorified cameos, a
seasoning in other director's stews. Yet in 1957, when Charlton Heston was
offered a role opposite Welles in a low-budget thriller for Universal, he
accepted on the condition Welles be allowed to direct.
The resulting film, Touch of Evil, was taken out of the
director's hands in the editing room, after Universal execs took a sneak
peek at his footage and panicked. In place of the socko B-movie they'd
commissioned, they found a baroque, expressionistic miasma of tilted angles
and bleeding neon and unrelenting tawdriness. (The tawdriness wasn't the
problem--the producer, Albert Zugsmith, followed up Touch of Evil
with passion-pit fodder like Sex Kittens Go to College.) Several
heated exchanges ensued. Welles, somewhat self-destructively, distanced
himself from the film's editing, and a new director, Harry Keller, was
brought in to shoot four "clarifying" scenes.
The day after seeing the studio's finished cut in 1958, Welles dashed
off a 58-page memo to Universal studio chief Ed Muhl. The memo addressed
aspects ranging from the movie's sound design to its narrative structure;
it proposed some 50 changes in Universal's edit. "I am passing on to you a
reaction based not on my conviction as to what my picture ought to be,"
Welles reasoned, "but only what here strikes me as significantly mistaken
in your picture." Instead, the studio hacked an additional 15 minutes from
the film after bad test screenings; it wound up literally the B picture on
a double bill with Keller's Female Animal, starring Hedy Lamarr.
Welles claimed never to have seen his movie again.
This year, a team led by film editor and sound wizard Walter Murch set
about reediting Touch of Evil according to the specifications in
Welles' memo. There's no restored footage: no outtakes could be found. Most
of the changes are so subtle that if you watch the two editions side by
side, you'll have a hard time finding the individual trims, shifts, and
remixes. And yet they have an undeniable cumulative effect. If you haven't
seen this lurid jewel in recent years, you'll be surprised by the new
edition's texture, narrative force, and suspense.
Touch of Evil's origins are as disreputable as the inhabitants of
its grubby locale, Los Robles, the proverbial border town where human life
is cheap. According to David Thomson's biography Rosebud, Welles
adapted (and kept pieces of) an existing Paul Monash script, which was
taken from a Whit Masterson penny dreadful called Badge of Evil.
Welles didn't even try to disguise the movie's genesis as hard-boiled
drugstore-paperback pulp; if anything, he enhanced it. From the justly
celebrated opening--which ticks off, in one unbroken shot, the minutes
leading to a fatal car-bombing--Touch of Evil immerses us in
extravagant degradation, a hothouse of Latin jazz and sweaty shadows and
windows that open onto darkness.
Welles deliberately played up the sleaziness of the locale, the better
to measure the fall of his detective villain, Hank Quinlan. In theory,
Quinlan isn't the intended focus of the movie: the purported heroes are
Mexican narcotics cop Mike Vargas (Heston, playing the unlikeliest Latino
since Robby Benson in Walk Proud) and his new bride Susie (Janet
Leigh). It's their honeymoon that is shattered by the bombing, which
separates the couple; it's their unwanted arrival that sets in motion the
plot's skittering trajectory.
But it's Quinlan who dominates the film from the moment he enters,
filling the frame like a fleshy balloon. Quinlan is Welles' worst vision of
himself: a kind of reverse vanity may have prompted Welles, though already
large, to assume rubbery jowls and pounds of padding. But the corrupt, once
idealistic lawman is right in keeping with the fallen Charles Foster Kane
and the tragic heroes of Welles' Shakespeare adaptations. Welles, after
all, chose to play Othello on film, not Hamlet; he played Falstaff, the
broken-hearted old wit consigned to insignificance, not bonny Prince Hal.
We're told Hank Quinlan was a great detective once; now he's stuck in
seedy nowheresville, fat and sloppy drunk, planting evidence to convict men
whose guilt he already knows. His scenes with Marlene Dietrich's
fortune-telling madam, Tana, his former lover, are suffused with a resigned
self-loathing that grows sadder every time you see the movie. "Wish I'd
gotten fat off your chili," he mumbles, taking a joyless, mulish chomp out
of his ever-present candy bar.
In the restored version, Murch's editing more evenly crosscuts the
scenes of Vargas' investigation and of Susie's siege at an isolated motel,
one of the creepiest set pieces in movie history. (Leigh always had lousy
luck with room service.) By doing so, though, Murch leaves Quinlan to
become the movie's center. Thus, the love story that resonates in the new
version isn't between Mike and Susie; it's between Quinlan and his loyal
sidekick Menzies (Joseph Calleia), the one man who knows his past
greatness--and who ultimately betrays him.
Even in its studio-tampered form, Touch of Evil is remarkable,
and some viewers might even miss its drugged, somnambular quality. The most
stunning differences, however, are in the opening sequence and the sound
design. The re-editing team removed the titles Universal plastered over the
astonishing first shot, which starts off with a close-up of a hand setting
a time bomb--three minutes, 20 seconds--then wanders in real time through
the streets of the town. Russell Metty's camera cranes around a building,
then moseys past revelers to catch up with Mike and Susie. Suddenly,
there's that damn car again with the bomb in the trunk. Check your
watch--the couple inside has a minute to live. Bear in mind that everything
in the extremely complicated shot has been timed to coincide with the
camera's movement. Then watch it all end in flames.
Without the credits or Henry Mancini's admittedly cool samba-jazz theme,
the town immediately comes to life as a locale, not a movie set--it has
three-dimensional space as well as a wealth of incidental sounds. (Those
sounds aren't accidental either--check out the way the doomed car's arrival
is heralded by the song crackling on its radio.) The emphasis on space
throughout is crucial to Welles' conception. Notice how many times the
director has action take place on opposite sides of a window, or how often
he crowds large people into small rooms in diagonal formations that
indicate their relative significance at the moment. The town's twisted
alleys and gnarled angles could be the corridors of Quinlan's mind: Vargas
briefly loses his way in them, but Quinlan's the one who finally sinks into
the quagmire. Then Dietrich has the last word--"Adios"--and the movie
follows her into the shadows.
Welles went on to a career that was no doubt as frustrating for him as
it was for his admirers. Without discriminating, he took bit parts in
historical pageants and trashy spectacles and unworthy horror cheapies. He
appeared on talk shows and spun outrageous lies about his life and work, as
if he had to make up claims for fame. One of the saddest artifacts of
Welles' later years is an oft-bootlegged outtake from a pea commercial, in
which he harangues the director about the proper inflection and wording of
the voiceover. What's sad isn't that someone of Welles' talent was reduced
to such a task; what's sad is that he was right about each of his
points. He had a showman's sense of what people want from a story and an
artist's sense of how best to arrange it, and all too often we were denied
the benefit of those gifts. The restored Touch of Evil clears away
all the planted evidence; what's left is proof of greatness enough for any
man.