U.S. Marshals was destined to be a footnote to cinema history
even before the film was shot; 10 years hence, someone will look up The
Fugitive in a video guide and read the words "spawned an unsuccessful
sequel, based on the Tommy Lee Jones character." Granted, Jones' part in
The Fugitive--as Harrison Ford's dogged pursuer Lieutenant Gerard--was a
highlight in a film full of highlights. But does he warrant a movie of his
own?
Not really. Ancillary characters are in a story for a reason, to bring
color and flash in short bursts. As exciting as Gerard and his staff of
lawmen were in The Fugitive, there's something curiously ordinary
about these folks as the subject of a feature. A team of federal cops
catching crooks is the stuff of weekly TV shows, not motion-picture
spectaculars.
The plot of U.S. Marshals is modified only slightly from its
predecessor. Wesley Snipes plays a man incarcerated for a frame-up crime.
During a "routine prison transfer"--is there any other kind in the
movies?--a planeful of convicts goes down, and Snipes makes his escape.
Jones is on the same plane, and he takes the con's flight personally. The
marshals are called in, along with a special government operative (played
by Robert Downey Jr., on loan from his own "routine prison transfer").
As in The Fugitive, there are close shaves and double-crosses and
the occasional eye-popping stunt, but this time out, the load is
unbalanced. Snipes' fugitive never develops into a recognizable person with
real emotions. We never feel his panic. Instead, we're immersed in the
hyperdrive rattle of Jones' dialogue, and the quick leaps of logic made by
him and his fellow cops.
In fact, U.S. Marshals might've made a fine police procedural, if
its plot twists weren't so obvious, and if it didn't carom off at
impossible angles. Even the opening crash lacks the heat of realism--when
the plane dives suddenly, no one hits the ceiling, and when the plane taxis
down a makeshift highway landing strip, its wing strikes several telephone
poles without sending the jet careening. Director Stuart Baird never
convinces us that there's an original thinker or a vivid imagination behind
the camera lens: A plane crash is a plane crash, and a chase is a chase.
This was never the case with The Fugitive, which had the audience
so fully engaged in the twin obsessions of Ford and Jones that we didn't
even mind the occasional awkward special effect. This point has been made
before in these pages, but I'll beat a dead horse yet again: If the only
reason to make a sequel is to repeat the bits that worked the first time
and hope that the money falls the same way, then filmmakers shouldn't
bother. It cheapens the memory of a good movie to make a fuzzy copy with
the same materials. It's like a magician repeating a trick clumsily, so
that we can see the coin going up his sleeve.