IF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE were reviewing Braveheart,
he'd likely say something like "Audacity, thy name is Mel."
For, quite simply, Braveheart is by a wide margin the best
film thus far this year, and the reason is that actor/director
Mel Gibson started with a clear, bold vision and carried it through
with amazing resolve.
Indeed, The Bard did say it best. Audacity runs wild through
this project.
It's audacious in that it runs nearly three hours with very few
lags, a serious oddity in this day and age of the cookie-cutter,
100-minute, get-'em-in-and-out-quickly movies.
It's audacious in that Gibson and the studio would buck a written-in-stone
law that says summer movies must be mindless fare: zany comedies,
action flicks with lots of explosions, plus the perfunctory Disney
animated project (which, by coincidence, Gibson also stars in
this year). To be sure, there is plenty of action in this film,
including some of the best battle scenes ever filmed, but it's
hand-to-hand combat, ugly and brutal, not stylized and phony.
And it's mostly audacious that Gibson would take such a bold
chance here. Face it, Gibson could have coasted along for the
rest of his career, making a Lethal Weapon movie every
few years and sprinkling in some romantic comedies along the way,
but he didn't. He chose to make a film so unformulaic that it
has wags scrambling to find comparisons.
(By the way, if anyone dares to compare it to Kevin Costner's
dreadful Robin Hood or even the wildly overrated Dances
With Wolves, you slap them hard, then send them to me.)
Gibson, often mistakenly dismissed as God's perfect collection
of eyes, smile and butt, has made an epic here, a film that constantly
surprises moviegoers with its sweep, depth and dazzling array
of visual delights.
Gibson stars as 13th-century Scottish freedom fighter William
Wallace, a man who has greatness thrust upon him when his life
is touched tragically by the incredibly sadistic English King
Edward the Longshanks (played deliciously by Patrick McGoohan).
Wallace is a complex character, a widely traveled man who speaks
Latin and French, but who would just as soon settle down as a
farmer in his home village and marry his childhood sweetheart.
When this hope is torn asunder, Wallace lashes out against the
hated English. He rallies to his cause Scottish nobles and peasants
alike, many of whom are reluctant to give up even the little they've
been doled out by the oppressive monarchy. Wallace is brave and
true, but he's also a rousing bundle of passion and savagery,
the latter of which, most crucial to the mix, Gibson deftly manages
neither to sugarcoat nor glorify.
Wallace begins by organizing his villagers into a loose-knit
fighting group ("militia" would be the right word here,
but I won't use it lest it provide an impetus to the sorry-ass
latter-day proponents thereof). There is a real sense of camaraderie
among Wallace and his fellow villagers--Hamish (Brendan Gleeson),
Campbell (James Cosmo) and Mornay (Alun Armstrong), as well as
with David O'Hara's Stephen, an Irishman who joins the Scots in
the battle against the crown.
Where the aforementioned Robin Hood had medieval warriors
trading banter straight from a bad cop-buddy movie, Braveheart
rings true throughout. These are men who share a common heritage
and purpose, who pretty much know their fate, yet fight on for
a purpose higher than mere victory.
Furthermore, where Hood was pretty and neat with a well-coifed
hero, Braveheart is dirty and dark. Life was hard in the
Middle Ages and director Gibson has a sharp eye for detail.
Much has been made of a scene in which Longshanks disposes of
his effeminate son's lover. Jeez, lighten up, folks. Political
correctness wasn't around in those days. Besides, it shows something
that our society has progressed to the point where such a scene
would add to our hatred of the evil king, rather than providing
a snicker, as it probably would have not that long ago.
Recently on the A&E Network, director David Lean (Lawrence
of Arabia) bemoaned the fact that, considering budget constraints
(and the play-it-safe mentality of the suits who run Hollywood),
the day of the great epic film may well be gone.
Happily, Lean was wrong. Braveheart fits comfortably alongside
Lawrence of Arabia and
Spartacus, another film to
which it favorably compares.
Braveheart may well bomb at the box office as the film's
length, its downer ending and overall seriousness overwhelm Gibson's
star power. But these are things for which Gibson should be applauded,
not penalized. Should that happen, the next dreamer of big cinematic
dreams could become gun shy. And that would be a shame.
Braveheart is a magnificent film, full of the things that
make moviemaking great. Make this your first movie of the summer.
Everything after that will be downhill, but you'll at least have
been to the mountaintop.