BRITISH ACCENTS, SWEEPING vistas, rustling skirts, squealing
pigs, heaving bosoms--it's amazing how consistent period movies
are these days. Jude, an adaptation of Thomas Hardy's Jude
the Obscure, takes the 19th century, with its surplus of coal
smoke and horseshit, and turns it into a pretty, drizzling, sexually
tempestuous time when men and women roamed the countryside, getting
laid.
The title character (Christopher Eccleston) is a gangly, stork-like
man who lives among rough country folk but dreams of being "a
university man." He reads Latin and Greek and walks around
the lovely English countryside with his ears sticking out, reciting
poetry. He meets a fiery country girl who throws a pig's heart
at him, then whips off her clothes. Jude marries her, but he doesn't
love her. Although the movie is more than two hours long, it gallops
along at an enjoyable pace, and the next thing we know, the wife
is gone and Jude has met the love of his life, a cousin, Sue (Kate
Winslet). Their devotion to each other grows, but of course, they
can't marry, since Jude is already hitched. In a fit Sue marries
someone else herself, but the two can't keep their hands off one
another and eventually they decide to live together, bucking the
conventions of the day.
Through all of this we are treated to plenty of flesh and plunging
bodices. I don't want to sound prudish, but what is it with "arty"
period films? It seems like those movies that should be the natural
choice to take one's grandmother to turn out to be the ones filled
with groping and grunting. Are we that nostalgic for repression?
Jude just makes the matter more confusing, because it's
a message movie, and the message it delivers is this: The church,
and the stringent morality of Victorian times, are malignant forces
that crush true love and religious feeling. This is not exactly
a hot topic for 1997.
Kate Winslet is excellent as the flighty Sue, a woman who longs
to be a free spirit but can't shake off the spiteful, straight-laced
morality of her times. She's alternately warm and bitchy, and
it's easy to see why Jude, a backwoods country boy yearning to
be an intellectual, would find her endlessly exotic and enticing.
More difficult to understand is Sue's affection for Jude, a role
that Eccleston never quite brings to life. Jude is cuter than
her other boyfriends, but he's also slow and over-earnest and
stares at her like a caged puppy at the Humane Society. There's
none of the brooding passion of The English Patient; the
two seem more like siblings than lovers. Despite a cute scene
in which Winslet takes off every stitch of clothing she has on,
as a love story, Jude is something of a failure.
What director Michael Winterbottom excels at, instead, is creating
an atmosphere of vague religious resonance. Thus, we have Jude
and Sue, with an infant in her arms, being turned away from inn
after inn in the pouring rain, resembling nothing less than the
holy family. Furthermore, despite the rhetoric against the church,
morality, etc., it does seem like the characters in this
story are basically punished for having sex, and that their happiest
times coincide with periods of chastity. I found all this odd
and annoying and as pointless as any action movie. It seemed like
Jude wasn't even trying to have any relevance for our times,
aside from providing some literary value, which would obviously
be better served by reading the book (something I haven't done).