Richard Linklater has finally abandoned the niche he's
carved for himself as the director of hip little movies about
alienated white kids. With The Newton Boys, he's left behind
a string of coming-of-age films like Slacker, SubUrbia,
and Before Sunrise (which all take place during 24
hour time periods) and voyaged into the comparatively unhip territory
of history. As it turns out, Linklater actually can make
a movie that spans more than one day, with characters who are
not wearing ripped jeans, and he can do it well. With The
Newton Boys, Linklater shows that he's not just a good, young
director. He's a good director.
It's too bad that a movie with so much charm has such a dismal
trailer. I almost didn't see it at all because I couldn't get
that cloying moment from the commercial out of my head, where
Julianna Margulies says "You're crazy!" while reclining
on top of Matthew McConaughey in a bathtub. Contrary to such advertising,
The Newton Boys is not an insipid love story. It is, instead,
an outlaw movie, in the mold of Bonnie and Clyde or Butch
Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, but without the last vestiges
of pesky morality that cling to those stories.
The Newton Boys were a real-life gang of bank robbers who approached
their calling as if it were an ordinary profession. Their strong
Puritan work ethic earned them the slogan "the most successful
bank robbers in American history," and they never did much
jail time for their crimes. The movie portrays them as a group
of Teen Beat cowboys with chiseled cheek bones and sunny
dispositions. The eldest, Willis (Matthew McConaughey), decides
to devote his life to crime and persuades his brothers to join
him, which they do after a little prodding. Then they drive around
in flashy, '20s clothing, robbing banks at night, with explosives--none
of this stick-'em up crap--and face relatively few obstacles.
The interesting thing about both the movie (and the history of
the Newton Boys) is that it seems to go against all conventional
notions of morality, not to mention common sense. For these brothers,
crime does pay. They make bank robbing look like a nifty
idea, and the risks seem small in proportion to the payoff. The
actors who portray the criminals are notoriously good-looking
young men: Skeet Ulrich, Ethan Hawke, and Vincent D'Onofrio round
out the cast; and they all have pleasant, if rascally, personalities.
The dialogue in this movie has the glib smoothness of a forgettable
Hollywood classic. Nothing sticks out or sounds awkward, but nothing
really shines, either. The combined effect of all this smooth
handsomeness is like stepping into a heated swimming pool--it's
just...pleasant. With this calm background, Linklater confirms
what we've always suspected: Nice boys can be sociopaths, too.
There's none of this searching-for-motives routine other crime
movies indulge in. The boys rob banks because they want to get
some money. There's no psycho-sexual origin story, as in Bonnie
and Clyde or Bloody Mama. There's no they-had-no-choice
rationale, as in Thelma and Louise. Linklater has
completely ditched the conventional morality cycle of the outlaw
movie. With other famous movie thieves--Butch Cassidy, et. al.--we
were on the bad guys' side, but their sins were so egregious that
they had to die at the end to set things right. Even though
those bank robbers meant well, or loved each other, or whatever,
those criminals were still, well, criminals. But the Newton Boys
are too cute to die. They're too efficient to get caught. Even
in the roaring age of prohibition and big-time gangsterism, they
can't even manage to kill anybody.
This portrayal of the Newton brothers as blessed and protected
golden boys would probably be annoying if it weren't at least
somewhat true. It seems they really didn't kill anybody, or deprive
widows of their life savings. To shore up his point of view, Linklater
wisely includes clips from TV interviews with a couple of the
real Newton Boys at the end of the film (one with Johnny Carson).
They come off as a couple of charming old cowboys. Watching them,
it seems entirely plausible that they did stumble into a life
of crime with no true malice in their hearts. What could be cuter
than an 80-year-old reformed gangster?